EU Chief Pressures Germany Over Ukraine Missile Delay

As Europe continues to respond to Russia’s deepening aggression in Ukraine, the European Union’s foreign policy chief has called for stepped-up support for Kyiv, in a pointed response to comments by Germany’s likely next chancellor, Friedrich Merz. This renewed emphasis on collective European action follows a brutal Russian missile attack on the Ukrainian city of Sumy.

Kaya Kallas, who leads the EU’s diplomatic service, said it was vital for all member states to contribute what they can, but the message from Brussels is clear: more must be done to support Ukraine’s defence and protect its civilians. Her comments came as she arrived at the latest EU Council of Foreign Affairs meeting in Brussels.

“Of course, each member state gives what it can give, but I think the message is very clear. We need to do more so that Ukraine can defend itself and the civilian population does not die,” said Kallas.

Her remarks were a direct response to Merz’s cautious position on the transfer of German-made Taurus long-range cruise missiles to Ukraine. While supportive in principle, Merz stressed that such a move should only be taken in coordination with European allies.

“I have always said that I would do it, but only in agreement with European partners,” said Merz, adding, “The British are doing it, the French are doing it, the Americans are doing it anyway. Supplies must be agreed upon and, if this is done, Germany must participate in them.”

This comes amid growing debate in Berlin, where public opinion appears hesitant. According to recent surveys, 64 percent of Germans oppose sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine, while only 30 percent support such military aid.

The debate over the Taurus missile highlights the tension between strategic military necessity and domestic political caution in Western Europe. The weapon in question, manufactured by MBDA Germany, is a high-precision air-launched cruise missile designed for deep-strike missions. It is capable of destroying heavily fortified underground targets, such as bunkers and command centres, by penetrating concrete and rock before detonating.

Merz also indicated that Ukrainian forces must not remain reactive, but should instead go on the offensive, especially targeting logistical corridors between Russia and occupied Crimea. He highlighted the strategic importance of destroying the land connections used by Russia to resupply its invading forces.

While Merz argues for unity and coordination, many Ukrainians and their supporters argue that the urgency of the situation requires swift and decisive support, rather than prolonged deliberation.

Despite Merz’s reservations, other Western allies have not waited. Britain, France, and the United States are already providing long-range weapons systems to Ukraine, underscoring the growing divide within Europe on how best to support Kyiv.

In Bucha, where some of the most horrific Russian war crimes took place, Trump’s spiritual advisor recently visited, remarking that “Soldiers are asking not for money, but for weapons.” His comments were widely shared in Ukraine, underlining the growing frustration with delays in delivering promised military support.

Ukraine remains reliant on international military aid, and delays in the supply of essential weapons have often been accompanied by deadly consequences on the battlefield.